![]() Resonator K if you need more versatility. Turbo K between the two not even a question for me. Stellite alloys have high melting points and extremely high wear and corrosion resistance making them very useful for applications like a machine gun barrel." "One common pre-war use for Stellite was valves, valve guides and valve seats in internal combustion engines. Stellite will likely hold up to hard use better than Inconel/SS, but the average person is unlikely to wear either one out.įYI, the Browning M2 uses a Stellite barrel liner, which was said to extend the service life of the barrel 3-4x over a standard barrel. YHM currently uses an Inconel blast baffle and the rest are 17-4 stainless. Tha Sandman series has a full Stellite baffle stack. More durable in what regard? Honest question. Hell for the price point YHM has set you can afford to suppress two rifles simultaneously without having to do the hot potato swap of a much more expensive single can at the range. With 5.56 its a touch quieter but its not nearly as obvious of a difference when comparing the two. I wasn't interested in another K can so I went the full sized Resonator R2 and that thing sounds absolutely killer with. If you want to shoot anything larger then get a Resonator K as it will sound almost exactly the same on the 5.56 setup. For a dedicated 5.56 can where you know it will still be loud regardless the Turbo K is clearly the winner. I still love my Sandman K especially on the. Fast forward to today with the much higher MSRP from Dead Air and YHM killing in the budget minded value arena I'd be hard pressed to pick the Sandman K over the Turbo K/Resonator K. ![]() If the Turbo K existed back when I bought my Sandman K I may have never bought it. For 5.56 only, the Turbo-K is an excellent choice. If there's any chance you might want to use this on larger calibers like 6.5 or 7.62, then I would lean towards the Sandman-K or Resonator-K. I have not compared the two suppressors in person, but it does seem like the Turbo-K does suppress a bit better than the Sandman-K, but at the cost of slightly higher backpressure. I am a huge fan of Dead Air's mounting system, but the YHM mount is also one of the best in the industry. Personally, if the idea was to dedicate the suppressor to a specific 5.56 rifle, I would buy a Turbo-K and use the included YHM QD mount. The Sandman-K does limit you to using only Dead Air muzzle devices, but that's really not a drawback in my opinion. That alone eliminates almost any costs savings the Turbo-K has over the Sandman-K. The Sandman-K has an integral mounting system, whereas you would have to buy a KeyMo adapter for the Turbo-K. I wish I had purchased two Turbo K's when I got my first. Probably just end up paying 100-200$ more for that extra tax stamp. I ended up buying a Turbo K as a beater 5.56 can and a Sandman S as my SHTF can also shot on 5.56 70% of the time.įWIW you can get two Turbo K cans for the price of just one Sandman K. I haven't shot a Sandman K but from my research when I was in a similar debate, videos and reviews showed the Turbo K a clear winner in the noise department. The Sandman line is pretty heavy.ĭepends on if you are already invested into the Keymo mounting system OR if you don't care because it'll never come off your SHTF gun. I do agree the Sandman series > Turbo K in regards to full auto mag dumps etc. They both accept the DA Keymo system so it depends on what system the OP uses or wants to get into. Having a removable end cap is superior than a welded on. I vote Sandman K.ĮTA: Sandman is more versatile if need be. The Sandman will be more durable and have a much better mounting system. Then you put a wipe in the Sandman(comes with wipe) and now have a quieter can than the Turbo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |